Petty v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Petty v. State

568 S.W.3d 90

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 26, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106300

StatusPublished

This text of 568 S.W.3d 90 (Petty v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petty v. State, 568 S.W.3d 90 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Petty (Appellant) appeals from the motion court's denial of his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).¹

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert Petty (Appellant) appeals from the motion court's denial of his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).¹

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 S.W.3d 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petty-v-state-moctapp-2019.