Petty v. Fleishel

31 Tex. 169
Texas Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Latimer, J.

—This is a suit based upon a note for four hundred and nine T6^-, in currency. Judgment by default.

Defendants contend that as the word dollars was not mentioned in the note, although the pleadings alleged the mistake in its omission, yet, as there was no jury, this could not be proved.

The note as copied is as follows:

“$409 68 cents. By the 1st day of April I promise to pay Fleishel & Smith, or bearer, four hundred and nine T6^-, in currency, for value received. L. F. Petty.

“ Starville, Texas, January 19, 1866.”

The note, beginning with “ $409 68” cents and proceeding with a promise to pay “ four hundred and nine •IIW” currency, furnishes ample authority to conclude that the sum to be paid was 409 68 cents, or $409 68 in currency.

There is no error in the judgment, and it is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petty v. Fleishel, 31 Tex. 169 (Tex. 1868).

31 Tex. 169 (Petty v. Fleishel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Citizens Bank of Georgetown v. Jones
220 P. 787 (Washington Supreme Court, 1923)
Kimball v. Costa
56 A. 1009 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1904)
Witty v. Michigan Mutual Life Insurance
24 N.E. 141 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Roberts v. State
11 Tex. Ct. App. 26 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1881)