Petty v. City of Atlanta

148 S.E. 747, 40 Ga. App. 63, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 17
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 17, 1929
Docket19468
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 148 S.E. 747 (Petty v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petty v. City of Atlanta, 148 S.E. 747, 40 Ga. App. 63, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 17 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Bell, J.

1. Under tlie rulings of the Supreme Court in Cornelisen v. City of Atlanta, 146 Ga. 416 (91 S. E. 415), where a city, in the maintenance of a park intended primarily for the promotion of the pleasure and health of the public at large, provides therein a swimming pool to be used for the same purpose, it is not responsible in damages for the negligent condition of an adjunct of the swimming pool, although a purely incidental profit might result from the operation thereof, and the city would have no authority to 'operate the swimming pool mainly as a source of revenue, in the absence of charter power to do so.

2. Neither under section 6 of the act approved August 23, 1927, amending the charter of the city of Atlanta (which section is quoted in the petition), nor under any other provision of its charter, has such municipality any authority to maintain a park or swimming pool primarily as a commercial enterprise for the purpose of adding revenue to the city treasury. See Ga. L. 1927, p. 779; Cooper v. Athens, 53 Ga. 638; Mayor &c. of Leesburg v. Putnam, 103. Ga. 110 (29 S. E. 602) ; Keen v. Waycross, 101 Ga. 588 (29 S. E. 42) ; Frank v. Atlanta, 72 Ga. 428 (1 b); Lofton v. Collins, 117 Ga. 434 (2) (43 S. E. 708, 61 L. R. A. 150) ; 44 C. J. 1101.

[64]*64Decided June 17, 1929.

3. “All laws and resolutions of the General Assembly, as published by authority, shall be held, deemed, and considered public laws,'and recognized judicially without proof.” Civil Code (1910), § 5797. “A demurrer only admits such facts as are well pleaded, and where the bill alleges facts as true which are contradicted by legislative acts and records of which the court is bound to take judicial notice, it can not hold such facts to be true, and they will not prevent the sustaining of the demurrer.” Griffin v. Augusta & Knoxville R., 72 Ga. 423 (2 d).

4. If, as alleged in the petition, the municipal officers undertook to maintain the park and the swimming pool as a private commercial enterprise for the purpose of financial gain to the city, the endeavor was ultra vires and no liability would attach to the municipality from acts or omissions of the city’s officers or employees in connection therewith. Cooper v. Athens, 53 Ga. 638 (2) ; Wood v. Floyd County, 161 Ga. 743 (2) (131 S. E. 882) ; and see also, in this connection, Autrey v. Augusta, 33 Ga. App. 757 (127 S. E. 796); Jones v. Atlanta, 35 Ga. App. 376 (133 S. E. 521); Reid v. Atlanta, 39 Ga. App. 519 (147 S. E. 789); Newton v. Moultrie, 39 Ga. App. 702 (148 S. E. 299).

5. The petition failed to set forth a cause of action, and the general demurrer thereto was properly sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur. Walter A. Sims, for plaintiff. J. L. Mayson, O. S. Winn, J. C. Savage, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleghorn v. City of Albany
362 S.E.2d 386 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Scott v. City of Millen
265 S.E.2d 30 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Sheley v. Board of Public Education
208 S.E.2d 126 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Pollock v. City of Albany
77 S.E.2d 579 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Washburn v. Foster
73 S.E.2d 240 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Ivory v. City of Montgomery
51 So. 2d 559 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1951)
Lankford v. Holton
51 S.E.2d 687 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Felton v. City of Great Falls
169 P.2d 229 (Montana Supreme Court, 1946)
Lee v. City of Atlanta
29 S.E.2d 774 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Harvey v. Mayor of Savannah
199 S.E. 653 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
City of Atlanta v. Garner
192 S.E. 841 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Roberts v. Mayor of Savannah
188 S.E. 39 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Watkins v. City of Toccoa
189 S.E. 270 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Atkins v. City of Durham
186 S.E. 330 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Hale v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 504 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 S.E. 747, 40 Ga. App. 63, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petty-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1929.