Petty v. Barrett

37 Tex. 84
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 37 Tex. 84 (Petty v. Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petty v. Barrett, 37 Tex. 84 (Tex. 1873).

Opinion

Walker, J.

J. J. Beeves and wife executed a deed of trust to F. M. Bogers, to secure the appellants harmless on two promissory notes due A. H. Shepard, for the aggregate sum of eighteen hundred dollars, which notes were indorsed by the appellants.

The deed of trust was given for a lot and improvements in the town of Sulphur Springs. Beeves lived upon the property, and carried on the business of a druggist. He died insolvent in 1863, and his wife died in 1866. The appellees are the children of J. J. Beeves and wife. J. J. Beeves, Jr., is about thirty years of age, and does not reside upon the property. Mary [85]*85married Barrett, and Laura married Mathews. All the defendants were over twenty-one years of age at the commencement of the suit. The appellants have paid the notes to Shepard. Upon this state of facts the appellants are entitled to have the property sold, and to be repaid the money, principal and the interest, which they have paid on the Shepard notes.

If the children and heirs take this property on the death of their parents, they must take it subject to the incumbrance. They cannot succeed to the homestead right of their parents, unless they had remained together as a family and occupied the property as a homestead.

It is not necessary that we should here decide whether the deed of trust would override the homestead right of a family of minor children, remaining together as a family, and occupying the property; or of a surviving widow, the head of a family. When it shall become necessary that this troublesome question should be decided by this court, upon a fair statement of facts we will endeavor to give its solution.

The judgment of the District Court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kearby v. Cox
211 S.W. 932 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1919)
Inge v. Cain
65 Tex. 75 (Texas Supreme Court, 1885)
McLane v. Paschal
47 Tex. 365 (Texas Supreme Court, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Tex. 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petty-v-barrett-tex-1873.