Petty, T. v. Federated Mutual Insurance

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 4, 2017
Docket117 WAL 2017
StatusPublished

This text of Petty, T. v. Federated Mutual Insurance (Petty, T. v. Federated Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petty, T. v. Federated Mutual Insurance, (Pa. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

TIANA PETTY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : No. 117 WAL 2017 PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF : TATIANA SMITH, A MINOR AND : ROSHINA GLOVER AND TASHARA : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from HANCOCK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : the Order of the Superior Court PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF : TARYN FOWLER, A MINOR, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE : COMPANY, : : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Petty, T. v. Federated Mutual Insurance, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petty-t-v-federated-mutual-insurance-pa-2017.