Petty, T. v. Federated Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 4, 2017·No. 117 WAL 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

TIANA PETTY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : No. 117 WAL 2017 PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF : TATIANA SMITH, A MINOR AND : ROSHINA GLOVER AND TASHARA : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from HANCOCK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : the Order of the Superior Court PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF : TARYN FOWLER, A MINOR, :

:

Petitioners :

: :

v. :

: :

FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE : COMPANY, :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petty, T. v. Federated Mutual Insurance, (Pa. 2017).

Petty, T. v. Federated Mutual Insurance (Petty, T. v. Federated Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.