Petty, Daniel v. Best Western Hotel

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin
DecidedJanuary 29, 2024
Docket3:24-cv-00070
StatusUnknown

This text of Petty, Daniel v. Best Western Hotel (Petty, Daniel v. Best Western Hotel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petty, Daniel v. Best Western Hotel, (W.D. Wis. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

DANIEL RHYMES PETTY,

Plaintiff, ORDER v. Case No. 24-cv-70-wmc BEST WESTERN HOTEL, et al.

Defendants.

Plaintiff Daniel Rhymes Petty, a prisoner in the custody of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, has submitted a proposed civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a certified copy of a trust fund account statement in support of a motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee. After considering the motion and supporting documentation, I conclude that plaintiff qualifies for indigent status. Even when a prisoner litigant qualifies for indigent status, the litigant must pay a portion of the filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Using information from plaintiff’s trust fund account statement for the six-month period preceding the complaint, I calculate plaintiff’s initial partial payment to be $9.42. For this case to proceed, plaintiff must submit this amount on or before February 20, 2024. If plaintiff does not have enough money to make the initial partial payment from a regular inmate account, then plaintiff should arrange with prison authorities to make the payment from a release account. However, prison officials will draw funds first from the plaintiff’s regular account, and then, if any portion of the payment remains, from the plaintiff’s release account. Carter v. Bennett, 399 F. Supp. 2d 936 (W.D. Wis. 2005). Federal courts have no authority to order state officials to allow a prisoner to withdraw funds from a release account for any other purpose. Id. ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff Daniel Rhymes Petty is assessed an initial partial payment of $9.42. Plaintiff must submit a check or money order payable to the clerk of court by February 20, 2024 or advise the court in writing why plaintiff is not able to make the initial partial payment. 2. If plaintiff fails to make the initial partial payment by February 20, 2024, or fails to show cause why the payment could not be made, then I will assume that plaintiff wishes to withdraw this action voluntarily. In that event, the case will be dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff refiling at a later date. 3. No further action will be taken in this case until the clerk’s office receives the

initial partial payment as directed above and the court has screened the complaint as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Once the screening process is complete, the court will issue a separate order.

Entered this 29th day of January, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ ANDREW R. WISEMAN United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. Bennett
399 F. Supp. 2d 936 (W.D. Wisconsin, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Petty, Daniel v. Best Western Hotel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petty-daniel-v-best-western-hotel-wiwd-2024.