Petty (Anthony) Vs. State
This text of Petty (Anthony) Vs. State (Petty (Anthony) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ANTHONY EDWARD PETTY, No. 79812 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. ef,4 8 /419 ELL2Y' A.EineAw - CLERK - •PIIVECOURT BY ----- ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEi'urfCtZRK
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for production of documents. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michelle Leavitt, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for production of documents, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J.
J. Parraguirre Cadish
cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Anthony Edward Petty Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA l q. aicivr (0) 1947A *SD.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Petty (Anthony) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petty-anthony-vs-state-nev-2019.