Pettus v. Wetzel

60 A.D.3d 766, 873 N.Y.S.2d 918
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 10, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 A.D.3d 766 (Pettus v. Wetzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pettus v. Wetzel, 60 A.D.3d 766, 873 N.Y.S.2d 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, in effect, to compel this Court to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Justices William Wetzel of the Supreme Court, New York County, and Guy Mangano, Jr., of the Supreme Court, Kings County, or to remove them from the bench. Application by the petitioner to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

[767]*767This Court does not have original subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding insofar as it is asserted against Justice Wetzel (see CPLR 506 [b] [1]). The proceeding insofar as asserted against Justice Wetzel should have been commenced in the Appellate Division, First Department.

The proceeding insofar as asserted against Justice Mangano must be dismissed on the ground that the relief sought against him is not available in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (see CPLR 7803). Fisher, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pettus v. District Attorney
76 A.D.2d 1153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A.D.3d 766, 873 N.Y.S.2d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pettus-v-wetzel-nyappdiv-2009.