Pettry v. State
This text of 252 So. 2d 659 (Pettry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Selling marijuana: sentence, five years.
The true bill omits the name of the buyer. Ground 5 of the defendant’s demurrer raised this deficiency. Hence, the trial court erred in overruling the demurrer. Duin v. State, 693, 260 So.2d 599 (mss. Mar. 16, 1971).
[238]*238In review of reversible error thus being shown, we have not examined any of the other points raised by appellant.
The judgment below is one to be reversed and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 So. 2d 659, 47 Ala. App. 237, 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pettry-v-state-alacrimapp-1971.