Pettry v. State

252 So. 2d 659, 47 Ala. App. 237, 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 485
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided May 11, 1971·No. 1 Div. 137·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

Selling marijuana: sentence, five years.

The true bill omits the name of the buyer. Ground 5 of the defendant’s demurrer raised this deficiency. Hence, the trial court erred in overruling the demurrer. Duin v. State, 693, 260 So.2d 599 (mss. Mar. 16, 1971).

[238]*238In review of reversible error thus being shown, we have not examined any of the other points raised by appellant.

The judgment below is one to be reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pettry v. State, 252 So. 2d 659, 47 Ala. App. 237, 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 485 (Ala. Ct. App. 1971).

252 So. 2d 659 (Pettry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jimmy v. State
286 So. 2d 907 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)
Van Nostrand v. State
286 So. 2d 903 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)
Jimmy v. State
286 So. 2d 907 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)
Adkins v. State
287 So. 2d 447 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)