Pettry v. McGinty

397 N.E.2d 1190, 60 Ohio St. 2d 92, 14 Ohio Op. 3d 331, 1979 Ohio LEXIS 505
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 12, 1979·No. No. 79-845·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“A writ of habeas corpus is an extraordinary remedy and will not ordinarily be granted when there is another adequate remedy at law.” Linger v. Weiss (1979), 57 Ohio St. 2d 97, 100-101. Juv. R. 7 (G) provides, in part: “Any decision relating to detention or shelter care may be reviewed at any time upon motion of any party.” Appellant can have a rehearing on the matter of the custody of his children. This is an adequate legal remedy sufficient to deny the request herein for a writ of habeas corpus.

[93]*93The judgment of the Court of Appeals is, therefore, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pettry v. McGinty, 397 N.E.2d 1190, 60 Ohio St. 2d 92, 14 Ohio Op. 3d 331, 1979 Ohio LEXIS 505 (Ohio 1979).

397 N.E.2d 1190 (Pettry v. McGinty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Wichtman
828 N.E.2d 169 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
Casdorph v. Kohl
629 N.E.2d 34 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1993)
Marks v. Vehlow
671 P.2d 473 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1983)