Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pettis v. State

Pettis v. State

265 So. 3d 732
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 2019
DocketCase No. 5D18-3600
StatusPublished

This text of 265 So. 3d 732 (Pettis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pettis v. State, 265 So. 3d 732 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard Pettis, III, appeals an order summarily denying his motion seeking additional jail credit. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801. Because the trial court failed to attach records conclusively refuting Pettis' claim, we reverse. See Hoskins v. State , 259 So.3d 892 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). On remand, the trial court shall either grant Pettis' motion, conduct an evidentiary hearing thereon, or attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim for additional jail credit. Shepman v. State , 249 So.3d 1318 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, CJ., ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wendi M. Shepman v. State
249 So. 3d 1318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
ANTHONY HOSKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
259 So. 3d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 So. 3d 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pettis-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.