Pettis v. State

265 So. 3d 732
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 2019·No. Case No. 5D18-3600·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard Pettis, III, appeals an order summarily denying his motion seeking additional jail credit. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801. Because the trial court failed to attach records conclusively refuting Pettis' claim, we reverse. See Hoskins v. State , 259 So.3d 892 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). On remand, the trial court shall either grant Pettis' motion, conduct an evidentiary hearing thereon, or attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim for additional jail credit. Shepman v. State , 249 So.3d 1318 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, CJ., ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pettis v. State, 265 So. 3d 732 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

265 So. 3d 732 (Pettis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wendi M. Shepman v. State
249 So. 3d 1318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
ANTHONY HOSKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
259 So. 3d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)