Pettigrew v. State

325 So. 2d 465
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pettigrew v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 295 So. 2d 672
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 1976·No. Nos. 74-411 to 74-413·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE AND GRANT APPELLEE’S PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Subsequent to the filing of the opinion and the issuance of the mandates, this case was overruled by our court in Roberts v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1975, 320 So.2d 832. In the meantime, the state had filed a petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court of Florida. Upon the issuance of our opinion in Roberts, the state filed a motion to recall our mandate and grant its petition for rehearing. The motion was denied, subject to reconsideration if the Supreme Court relinquished jurisdiction to this court. The Supreme Court has now entered an order temporarily relinquishing jurisdiction to this court. In view of our holding in Roberts, our opinion in the instant case is. hereby withdrawn, 316 So.2d 69, all three judgments entered below are affirmed, and the mandate in Case No. 74-412 shall be amended accordingly.

McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pettigrew v. State, 325 So. 2d 465 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

325 So. 2d 465 (Pettigrew v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. State
320 So. 2d 832 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Pettigrew v. State
316 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)