Pettigrew v. Nite-Cap

63 So. 2d 492, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1121
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 63 So. 2d 492 (Pettigrew v. Nite-Cap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pettigrew v. Nite-Cap, 63 So. 2d 492, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1121 (Fla. 1953).

Opinion

63 So.2d 492 (1953)

PETTIGREW et al.
v.
NITE-CAP, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

February 27, 1953.
Rehearing Denied March 26, 1953.

Francis K. Buckley and Miller & Miller, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

DREW, Justice.

About eleven o'clock in the evening appellant Jennie R. Pettigrew was injured when she walked into a large plate glass door at the entrance of appellee's restaurant. She alleged the lighting inside the premises and the clear colorless glass door, void of markings or handles or other visible objects thereon, rendered the door invisible to such an extent that she did not see it and that the maintenance of such door in the condition described constituted negligence, and that such negligence was the cause of appellant's injury.

Appellant's testimony showed that the door was of clear glass but that there was a wide metal strip on the top and bottom of the door and a lucite handle located in the usual place on the door with black knobs at the top and bottom to hold it in place.

At the close of appellant's case the lower court directed a verdict for the appellee, final judgment was entered and this appeal followed.

*493 The handle, knobs and metal strip on the door were plainly visible and the door was located at the place a door would naturally be expected. It is clear to us that the sole proximate cause of plaintiff's injury was her failure to see that which, by the exercise of reasonable care, she should have seen. See Rosenberg v. Hartman, 313 Mass. 54, 46 N.E.2d 406.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C.J., and THOMAS and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Giordano v. Mariano
271 A.2d 20 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
James J. Dvorak v. Holiday Inns of America, Inc.
429 F.2d 54 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Waugh v. Duke Corporation
248 F. Supp. 626 (M.D. North Carolina, 1966)
Winthrop v. 1600 16TH STREET CORPORATION
208 A.2d 624 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1965)
Peppermint Twist, Inc. v. Wright ex rel. Wright
169 So. 2d 330 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Jensen v. Grace Lutheran Church of Clear-Water, Inc.
163 So. 2d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Presbyterian School of Christian Education, Inc. v. Clark
135 S.E.2d 832 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1964)
Isenberg v. Ortona Park Recreational Center, Inc.
160 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Brown v. Alabama Foods, Inc.
190 A.2d 257 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1963)
Bashaw v. Dyke
122 So. 2d 507 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Cooper v. Scharf
11 A.D.2d 101 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
McCain v. Bankers Life and Casualty Co.
110 So. 2d 718 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Harold Corp. v. Herzberg
110 So. 2d 683 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Stone v. Hotel Seville, Inc.
104 So. 2d 847 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Kagan v. Eisenstadt
98 So. 2d 370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)
Dewar v. City of Miami
93 So. 2d 58 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Dukek v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.
80 N.W.2d 53 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 So. 2d 492, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pettigrew-v-nite-cap-fla-1953.