Pettice v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Pettice v. State

89 So. 99, 18 Ala. App. 90, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 76

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 5, 1921

Docket4 Div. 668.

StatusPublished

This text of 89 So. 99 (Pettice v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pettice v. State, 89 So. 99, 18 Ala. App. 90, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 76 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The appellant was indicted for assault with intent to murder, and convicted of assault and battery.

The testimony was in sharp conflict as to the details of the difficulty, and from the verdict the jury evidently believed the contention of the state and its witnesses, and there was abundant testimony upon which to predicate the verdict.

[1,2] There was no reversible error in the rulings of the court on the introduction of the testimony.

[3] The written charge refused to the defendant was substantially covered by the court’s oral charge.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI