Petti v. State
This text of 227 So. 2d 746 (Petti v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s main thrust on appeal surrounds the in-court identification by the victim. The record permits us to conclude that this identification was of a source wholly independent of any earlier confrontation. United States v. Wade, 1967, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149; Stovall v. Denno, 1967, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199; and Anderson V. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 618.
The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the defendant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 So. 2d 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petti-v-state-fladistctapp-1969.