Petti v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Petti v. State

227 So. 2d 746

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 17, 1969·No. No. 2186·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s main thrust on appeal surrounds the in-court identification by the victim. The record permits us to conclude that this identification was of a source wholly independent of any earlier confrontation. United States v. Wade, 1967, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149; Stovall v. Denno, 1967, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199; and Anderson V. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 618.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the defendant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN, and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s main thrust on appeal surrounds the in-court identification by the victim. The record permits us to conclude that this identification was of a source wholly independent of any earlier confrontation. United States v. Wade, 1967, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149; Stovall v. Denno, 1967, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199; and Anderson V. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 618.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the defendant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN, and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Petti v. State, 227 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

227 So. 2d 746 (Petti v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related