Pettey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pettey v. State

515 S.W.3d 246, 2017 WL 1228769, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 265

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 4, 2017·No. No. ED 104279·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Calvin Pettey (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a jury trial, Movant was convicted of first-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.020 (RSMo. 2000). Movant was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[247] The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Calvin Pettey (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a jury trial, Movant was convicted of first-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.020 (RSMo. 2000). Movant was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[247] The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Pettey v. State, 515 S.W.3d 246, 2017 WL 1228769, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 265 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

515 S.W.3d 246 (Pettey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.