Petteruti v. Davis Grant Medical Center
174 F. App'x 381
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 10, 2006·No. Nos. 05-16412, 05-16418, 05-16419·Published
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in these appeals are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Petteruti v. Davis Grant Medical Center, 174 F. App'x 381 (9th Cir. 2006).
174 F. App'x 381 (Petteruti v. Davis Grant Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)