Petterson v. Board of Education

141 A. 924, 6 N.J. Misc. 374, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 303
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 3, 1928·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Minturn, J.

My consideration of the points raised in the above-entitled matter on which the writ; of certiorari was granted, leads me to conclude that they are not supported by the law or the testimony. Without entering into a detailed statement of the legal reasons applicable to the situation I may say that the case is governed by the recent adjudication in the Supreme Court of Hahn Motor Truck Corp. v. Atlantic City, involving the purchase of a fire engine. This case involves the purchase of an oil burner, but the legal rule applicable to the situation is aptly and accurately stated by the Supreme Court in the case referred to.

The application of that rule to this case must result in the dismissal of the writ, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petterson v. Board of Education, 141 A. 924, 6 N.J. Misc. 374, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 303 (N.J. 1928).

141 A. 924 (Petterson v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Closter Serv. Stat. Inc. v. RIDGEFIELD PK. COM'RS
238 A.2d 504 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
Peter's Garage, Inc. v. City of Burlington
3 A.2d 634 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1939)