Pettengill v. City of Yonkers

1 N.Y.S. 805, 15 N.Y. St. Rep. 854, 48 Hun 618, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1584
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 14, 1888·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Dykman, J.

This is an action by the husband for the loss and expenses incurred by him by reason of injuries sustained by his wife through the negligence of the defendant. The right of the wife to recover for her injuries has been settled by the general term, and the right of the husband to recover for loss of services of his wife, and his expenses incident to such injuries, follows that determination. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pettengill v. City of Yonkers, 1 N.Y.S. 805, 15 N.Y. St. Rep. 854, 48 Hun 618, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1584 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

1 N.Y.S. 805 (Pettengill v. City of Yonkers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andréu v. Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co.
33 P.R. 586 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1924)
Womach v. City of St. Joseph
100 S.W. 443 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1907)