Pettee v. Coggeshall
This text of 71 Mass. 51 (Pettee v. Coggeshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the trial, the plaintiff gave evidence tending to prove such payment; and offered certain conveyances of real estate, made by the defendant within six weeks previously, as evidence tending to show the state of his property, a.nd how much had been previously disposed of, but without any suggestion that the proceeds thereof were fraudulently applied. The defendant objected to the admission in evidence of these conveyances, (not being specified in the replication,) as irrelevant, and having no tendency to show that the payment to Williams was made with an intent to prefer him. But Dewey, J. admitted them as competent to show that the defendant had disposed of so much of his property before the payment to Williams. And the court now affirmed this ruling, and entered
Judgment on the verdict for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 Mass. 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pettee-v-coggeshall-mass-1855.