Petruzzi v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Petruzzi v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

259 A.D. 706

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1940·Published

Opinion

On the facts disclosed the court, in the exercise of sound discretion, should refuse to assume jurisdiction. Order entered February 28, 1939, so far as appealed from, the resettled order entered April 29, 1939, and the order entered on or about April 12, 1939, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, the motion of plaintiff Daniel Petruzzi, as administrator, etc., to compel acceptance of an amended summons and complaint or to add Frank Solon and Dana Solon as plaintiffs denied, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint granted. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callar' han, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the facts disclosed the court, in the exercise of sound discretion, should refuse to assume jurisdiction. Order entered February 28, 1939, so far as appealed from, the resettled order entered April 29, 1939, and the order entered on or about April 12, 1939, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, the motion of plaintiff Daniel Petruzzi, as administrator, etc., to compel acceptance of an amended summons and complaint or to add Frank Solon and Dana Solon as plaintiffs denied, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint granted. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callar' han, JJ.

Petruzzi v. Lehigh Valley Railroad, 259 A.D. 706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 706 (Petruzzi v. Lehigh Valley Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.