Petrus v. MINNEGASCO, INC.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Petrus v. MINNEGASCO, INC.

741 N.W.2d 600, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 750, 2007 WL 4260167

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided November 21, 2007·No. A07-1534·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 11, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 NW.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [sjummary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lorie S. Gildea

Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 11, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 NW.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [sjummary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lorie S. Gildea

Associate Justice

Petrus v. MINNEGASCO, INC., 741 N.W.2d 600, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 750, 2007 WL 4260167 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

741 N.W.2d 600 (Petrus v. MINNEGASCO, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related