Petrus v. Berlin Mills Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Petrus v. Berlin Mills Co.

71 A. 213, 75 N.H. 587, 1908 N.H. LEXIS 65

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedNovember 4, 1908

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 A. 213 (Petrus v. Berlin Mills Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petrus v. Berlin Mills Co., 71 A. 213, 75 N.H. 587, 1908 N.H. LEXIS 65 (N.H. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Young, J.

There was evidence that the defendants either knew or ought to have known of the danger incident to the condition of their premises which caused the plaintiff’s injury, in season to have removed the danger or to have warned him of it, and that, he neither knew of the danger nor was in fault for not knowing-of it.,, Consequently, the evidence should have been submitted to-the jury.

Exception sustained.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young, J.

There was evidence that the defendants either knew or ought to have known of the danger incident to the condition of their premises which caused the plaintiff’s injury, in season to have removed the danger or to have warned him of it, and that, he neither knew of the danger nor was in fault for not knowing-of it.,, Consequently, the evidence should have been submitted to-the jury.

Exception sustained.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A. 213, 75 N.H. 587, 1908 N.H. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrus-v-berlin-mills-co-nh-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack