Petrukevich v. Maksimovich

1 A.D.2d 786, 147 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6601
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 23, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 1 A.D.2d 786 (Petrukevich v. Maksimovich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petrukevich v. Maksimovich, 1 A.D.2d 786, 147 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6601 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

In an action to impress a trust on real property owned by appellant, the appeal is from a judgment granting respondent a lien on the premises for the amount expended by her in the improvement of the property on the faith of appellant’s oral promise to convey title to respondent on completion of the improvements. Judgment modified on the law by striking therefrom the second decretal paragraph and, as so modified, judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. Where a relation of confidence has been abused, and a person has never had title to the property but has expended money in the improvement of the property on the basis of an oral promise to convey, which money does not constitute the entire consideration for the purchase of the interest claimed, that person is entitled, not to a conveyance of the property, but only to an equitable lien thereon for the amount expended. (Leary v. Corvin, 181 N. Y. 222; Foreman v. Foreman, 251 N. Y. 237, 242; McCarthy v. McCarthy, 284 App. Div. 813.) In such case equity grants relief despite the fact that the oral promise to convey is violative of the Statute of Frauds. (Leary v. Corvin, supra; McCarthy v. McCarthy, supra.) Present ■—Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farr v. Covert
34 A.D.3d 1204 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Reisner v. Stoller
51 F. Supp. 2d 430 (S.D. New York, 1999)
Lester v. Zimmer
197 A.D.2d 783 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Kelly v. Religa (In Re Religa)
157 B.R. 54 (W.D. New York, 1993)
Johnston v. Martin
183 A.D.2d 1019 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Jacone v. DeRosa
173 A.D.2d 525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Gargano v. V.C.&J. Construction Corp.
148 A.D.2d 417 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Musso v. Tesmetges (In Re Tesmetges)
47 B.R. 385 (E.D. New York, 1984)
Disanza v. Gaglione
126 Misc. 2d 232 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
Scivoletti v. Marsala
97 A.D.2d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 A.D.2d 786, 147 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrukevich-v-maksimovich-nyappdiv-1956.