Petrucci v. State

454 So. 2d 743, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1833, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14694
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 21, 1984·No. No. 84-1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record, the briefs, and argument of counsel, it is apparent to this court that the trial judge imposed a sentence at variance with the plea agreement entered into between the state and the defendant. We remand this case to the trial court with directions to conform the sentence to the plea agreement or, in the alternative, permit the defendant to withdraw his plea.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petrucci v. State, 454 So. 2d 743, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1833, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14694 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

454 So. 2d 743 (Petrucci v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlantic Plastering, Inc. v. O'HARA
454 So. 2d 743 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)