Petrucci v. Petrucci

252 So. 2d 867
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 5, 1971
Docket71-607
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 252 So. 2d 867 (Petrucci v. Petrucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petrucci v. Petrucci, 252 So. 2d 867 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

252 So.2d 867 (1971)

Emilie S. PETRUCCI, Appellant,
v.
Frank R. PETRUCCI, Appellee.

No. 71-607.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 5, 1971.

*868 Emilie S. Petrucci, in pro. per.

John Gale, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

Appellant, the divorced wife of appellee, has prosecuted this appeal, in proper person, to review those portions of an order reducing child support arrearages by crediting the husband with payments made for the two children's college expenses and staying execution upon the judgment under certain conditions, such as remaining current in his payments. The order was entered after hearing on the ex-wife's motion for entry of judgment on child support arrearages.

We note that the parties had appeared before this court in Petrucci v. Petrucci, Fla.App. 1967, 199 So.2d 516.

A settlement agreement was incorporated into the final divorce decree and it dealt with child support and possible college expenses. Certain arrearages had previously been reduced to judgment.

In Florida, the unpaid child support constitutes a vested right not subject to modification. Therefore, the court erred in ordering a reduction of accrued child support. Van Loon v. Van Loon, 132 Fla. 535, 182 So. 205; Gottesman v. Gottesman, Fla.App. 1969, 220 So.2d 640, 642; see generally, "Retrospective modification of, or refusal to enforce, decree for alimony, separate maintenance or support," 6 A.L.R.2d 1277 (1949).

Appellant next objects to that part of the court order which withheld enforcement of the judgment upon certain conditions. We have considered the briefs and oral argument as to this issue, and express the view that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error.

For the reasons stated, the order appealed is affirmed, except as to that part which allows the ex-husband credit for any payments made toward the college expenses of either or both of the children.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1996
Waldman v. Waldman
612 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Hernandez v. Hernandez
604 So. 2d 936 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cimitier v. Cimitier
579 So. 2d 142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Onley v. Onley
540 So. 2d 880 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Smith v. Smith
498 So. 2d 687 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Ledford v. Leirer
486 So. 2d 42 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
SHUFFLEBARGER BY OKTAVEC v. Shufflebarger
460 So. 2d 982 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Raybuck v. Raybuck
451 So. 2d 540 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Hazelwood v. Hazelwood
449 So. 2d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Panganiban v. Panganiban
396 So. 2d 1156 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Fox v. Haislett
388 So. 2d 1261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Tash v. Oesterle
380 So. 2d 1316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Costea v. Sanzo
378 So. 2d 1327 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Burdack v. Burdack
371 So. 2d 528 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Smithwick v. Smithwick
343 So. 2d 945 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Teta v. Teta
297 So. 2d 642 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Hynes v. Hynes
277 So. 2d 557 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Hurst v. Hampton
274 So. 2d 891 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 So. 2d 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrucci-v-petrucci-fladistctapp-1971.