PETRONGLO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA <font color="red">DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE</font>
This text of PETRONGLO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA <font color="red">DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE</font> (PETRONGLO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA <font color="red">DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE</font>) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ____________________________________ THOMAS EDWARD PETRONGLO, : : Petitioner, : Civ. No. 23-23328 (RBK) : v. : : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : MEMORANDUM & ORDER : Respondent. : ____________________________________:
Petitioner is a federal prisoner presently confined at F.C.I. Fort Dix in Fort Dix, New Jersey. He has filed a motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (See ECF 1). Local Civil Rule 81.2 though provides: Unless prepared by counsel, . . . motions under 28 U.S.C. §2255 shall be in writing (legibly handwritten in ink or typewritten), signed by the petitioner or movant, on forms supplied by the Clerk.
L. Civ. R. 81.2(a). Petitioner did not use the § 2255 form supplied by the Clerk for section 2255 motions, i.e., AO243 (modified): DNJ-Habeas-004 (Rev. 01-2014). Thus, this matter will be administratively terminated at the present time. Accordingly, IT IS on this 2nd day of January 2024, ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively terminate this case; Petitioner is informed that administrative termination is not a “dismissal” for purposes of the statute of limitations, and that if the case is reopened, it is not subject to the statute of limitations time bar if it was originally filed timely, see Papotto v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 731 F.3d 265, 275 (3d Cir. 2013) (distinguishing administrative terminations from dismissals); and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk's service of the blank § 2255 motion form shall not be construed as this Court’s finding that the motion is or is not timely, or that Petitioner's claims are or are not procedurally defaulted; and it is further ORDERED that if Petitioner wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court, in a
writing addressed to the Clerk, within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this memorandum and order; Petitioner’s writing shall include a complete, signed § 2255 motion on the appropriate form; and it is further ORDERED that upon receipt of a writing from Petitioner stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and a complete, signed § 2255 motion, the Clerk will be directed to reopen this case; and it is finally ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve on Petitioner by regular U.S. mail: (1) a copy of this memorandum and order; and (2) a blank copy of a motion to vacate, set aside or correct a sentence by a person in federal custody – AO 243 (modified): DNJ-Habeas-004 (Rev.01-2014).
s/ Robert B. Kugler ROBERT B. KUGLER United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
PETRONGLO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA <font color="red">DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE</font>, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petronglo-v-united-states-of-america-font-colorreddo-not-file-in-this-njd-2024.