Petrolon Management, Inc. v. Howe Laboratories, Inc.
This text of 60 F.3d 816 (Petrolon Management, Inc. v. Howe Laboratories, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 F.3d 816
Petrolon Management, Inc.
v.
Howe Laboratories, Inc., Sonny Herman Howard, Howe Chemical
Co., Dura-Lube Corp. National Communications, Inc., Mood
Company, Inc., Crescent Marketing, Inc., a/k/a Crescent
Manufacturing, American Industries, Inc., Howe Plastics and
Chemical Company, Inc., Howe Company, Inc., Media Group,
Media Marketing Enterprises, AP Wholesalers, New York
Partnership, American Direct Marketing, Inc., Durable
Products, William Jeter, Danny Hopkins
NO. 94-7648
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
May 11, 1995
Appeal From: D.Del., No. 93-511,
Farnan, J.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 816, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15226, 1995 WL 392584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrolon-management-inc-v-howe-laboratories-inc-ca3-1995.