Petroleum Wholesale, Inc. v. Shabana Enterprises, Inc. and Hussian Varsha
This text of Petroleum Wholesale, Inc. v. Shabana Enterprises, Inc. and Hussian Varsha (Petroleum Wholesale, Inc. v. Shabana Enterprises, Inc. and Hussian Varsha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-00-0356-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
APRIL 2, 2002
______________________________
PETROLEUM WHOLESALE, INC., APPELLANT
V.
SHABANA ENTERPRISES, INC. AND VARSHA HUSSAIN, APPELLEES
_________________________________
FROM THE 133RD DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;
NO. 97-44520; HONORABLE LAMAR MCCORKLE, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.
Appellant Petroleum Wholesale, Inc. filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial
court’s judgment that appellees Shabana Enterprises, Inc. and Varsha Hussain recover
$11,000 plus interest and attorney’s fees. The clerk’s record and reporter’s record have
been filed. On May 2, 2001, the appeal was abated at the request of the parties to
continue settlement negotiations. By letter dated December 11, 2001, this Court notified counsel that the appeal had been reinstated and that Petroleum Wholesale’s brief was due
to be filed by January 11, 2002. In response, Petroleum Wholesale filed a motion for
extension of time in which to file its brief and the Court granted the motion until February
11, 2002. The brief was not filed. By letter dated March 14, 2002, this Court notified
counsel of the defect and also directed counsel to reasonably explain the failure to file a
brief together with a showing that Shabana Enterprises and Varsha Hussain have not been
significantly injured by the delay by March 25, 2002. Counsel for Shabana Enterprises
responded by forwarding copy of a letter dated March 25, 2002, to counsel for Petroleum
Wholesale indicating that Shabana Enterprises was withdrawing the settlement agreement
and proceeding with the case. Counsel for Petroleum Wholesale did not respond to this
Court’s letter and the brief remains outstanding.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution and for failure to comply
with an order of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(a) and (c).
Don H. Reavis Justice
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Petroleum Wholesale, Inc. v. Shabana Enterprises, Inc. and Hussian Varsha, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petroleum-wholesale-inc-v-shabana-enterprises-inc--texapp-2002.