Petroleum Rental Tools, Inc. v. Hal Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Petroleum Rental Tools, Inc. v. Hal Oil & Gas Co.

683 So. 2d 253, 1996 La. LEXIS 3073, 1996 WL 658968

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 8, 1996

DocketNo. 96-C-1819

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 683 So. 2d 253 (Petroleum Rental Tools, Inc. v. Hal Oil & Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petroleum Rental Tools, Inc. v. Hal Oil & Gas Co., 683 So. 2d 253, 1996 La. LEXIS 3073, 1996 WL 658968 (La. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Petroleum Rental Tools, Inc.; Ron Bridges & Associates, Inc.; — Plaintiffs); Ap[254]*254plying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 66722; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. CA95 1820, CA95 1821.

Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside. Case remanded to the court of appeal to reconsider Tadlock’s percentage of fault as a non-party to the tort suit pursuant to La.Code Civ.P. art. 1812. Further, the court of appeal should reconsider whether the dismissal of relators’ third party demand against Tadloek was preserved on appeal, since it appears relators appealed the entire judgment, which may have encompassed the dismissal of the third party demand.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Petroleum Rental Tools, Inc.; Ron Bridges & Associates, Inc.; — Plaintiffs); Ap[254]*254plying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 66722; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. CA95 1820, CA95 1821.

Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside. Case remanded to the court of appeal to reconsider Tadlock’s percentage of fault as a non-party to the tort suit pursuant to La.Code Civ.P. art. 1812. Further, the court of appeal should reconsider whether the dismissal of relators’ third party demand against Tadloek was preserved on appeal, since it appears relators appealed the entire judgment, which may have encompassed the dismissal of the third party demand.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

683 So. 2d 253, 1996 La. LEXIS 3073, 1996 WL 658968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petroleum-rental-tools-inc-v-hal-oil-gas-co-la-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack