Petroff v. Petroff

593 So. 2d 1227, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1853, 1992 WL 36301
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1295
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 593 So. 2d 1227 (Petroff v. Petroff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petroff v. Petroff, 593 So. 2d 1227, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1853, 1992 WL 36301 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal before us involves review of an order of dismissal on the grounds of res judicata and collateral estoppel. A motion to dismiss should not be granted on those grounds unless the defense is established by the facts alleged in the face of the complaint. Byrd v. City of Niceville, 541 So.2d 696 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Since such defenses were not established by the complaint, dismissal for this reason was inappropriate. Strachan Shipping Co. v. Spigner, 573 So.2d 926 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), rev. denied, Barreras v. Strachan Shopping Co., 583 So.2d 1034 (Fla.1991). We find the trial court’s action to be in error, and reverse.

BOOTH, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brundage v. State
593 So. 2d 1227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
593 So. 2d 1227, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1853, 1992 WL 36301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petroff-v-petroff-fladistctapp-1992.