Petro Tolas v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of Petro Tolas v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Petro Tolas v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 3, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
147186 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack PETRO J. TOLAS, David F. Viviano, Plaintiff, Justices
v SC: 147186 AGC: 2009-12 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 3, 2013 p0826 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Petro Tolas v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petro-tolas-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2013.