Petro Realty Corp. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
158 Conn. 629
Opinion
It appearing that the plaintiff in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute its appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.
The appellant filed a motion for reargument which was denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Petro Realty Corp. v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 158 Conn. 629 (Colo. 1969).
158 Conn. 629 (Petro Realty Corp. v. Planning & Zoning Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.