Petrit Diko v. State
This text of Petrit Diko v. State (Petrit Diko v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-15-00099-CR
PETRIT DIKO APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM THE 211TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. F-2012-0431-C
DISSENTING OPINION
I cannot join the conscientious majority because in order to convict a
defendant of a criminal offense, the jury must unanimously find the defendant
guilty of the same offense beyond a reasonable doubt. The majority appears to
agree with the State’s jury argument stating that unanimity is not required. I must therefore respectfully dissent for the reasons I explained in my dissent to the
majority in Bundy v. State.1
/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot LEE ANN DAUPHINOT JUSTICE
PUBLISH
DELIVERED: April 14, 2016
280 S.W.3d 425, 436–40 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, pet. ref’d) 1
(Dauphinot, J., dissenting).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Petrit Diko v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrit-diko-v-state-texapp-2016.