Petrillo v. Town of Hempstead

85 A.D.3d 996, 925 N.Y.S.2d 866

This text of 85 A.D.3d 996 (Petrillo v. Town of Hempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petrillo v. Town of Hempstead, 85 A.D.3d 996, 925 N.Y.S.2d 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, Jr., J.), dated September 17, 2009, as granted those branches of the renewed motion of the defendant Town of Hempstead and the cross motion of the defendant Alfred G. Keifer, Jr., as executor of the estate of Irene G. Keifer, which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order appealed from was superseded by an order of the same court entered April 15, 2010, made upon reargument (see Petrillo v Town of Hempstead, 85 AD3d 996 [2011] [decided herewith]). Rivera, J.P., Eng, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Petrillo v. Town of Hempstead
85 A.D.3d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 A.D.3d 996, 925 N.Y.S.2d 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrillo-v-town-of-hempstead-nyappdiv-2011.