Petrillo v. Petrillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Petrillo v. Petrillo

38 A.D.2d 952, 331 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5172

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 952 (Petrillo v. Petrillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petrillo v. Petrillo, 38 A.D.2d 952, 331 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for divorce, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 18, 1971, as, on reargument, adhered to the original decision granting plaintiff’s motion for temporary alimony, child support and counsel fees. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, any seeming inequity in the awards made should be resolved by an early and speedy trial (Tobias v. Tobias, 36 A D 2d 643; Lebovics v. Lebovics, 34 A D 2d 783), as heretofore directed by order of this court dated November 11, 1971. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for divorce, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 18, 1971, as, on reargument, adhered to the original decision granting plaintiff’s motion for temporary alimony, child support and counsel fees. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, any seeming inequity in the awards made should be resolved by an early and speedy trial (Tobias v. Tobias, 36 A D 2d 643; Lebovics v. Lebovics, 34 A D 2d 783), as heretofore directed by order of this court dated November 11, 1971. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 952, 331 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrillo-v-petrillo-nyappdiv-1972.