Petrillo v. Pearsall

249 A.D. 778, 292 N.Y.S. 1005, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5974

This text of 249 A.D. 778 (Petrillo v. Pearsall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petrillo v. Pearsall, 249 A.D. 778, 292 N.Y.S. 1005, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Order denying the motion of the appealing defendants, as aldermen and constituting the common council of the city of Mount Vernon, to strike out their names as parties to a mandamus proceeding and to dismiss the proceeding as against them, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D. 778, 292 N.Y.S. 1005, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrillo-v-pearsall-nyappdiv-1936.