Petrilla v. Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport
162 A. 589, 109 N.J.L. 350, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 353
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — -None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Petrilla v. Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport, 162 A. 589, 109 N.J.L. 350, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 353 (N.J. 1932).
162 A. 589 (Petrilla v. Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.