Petrilla v. Castillo (Child Custody)
Opinion
An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 12 .
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JUSTIN PETRILLA, No. 87566
. l‘a‘ Ff: :: MARISSA. ROSE CASTILLQ, F g is Eu- Q Reecndent. ‘
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This pro se appeal was docketed in this court on March 13, 2015, without payment of the requisite filing-fee. On that same day, this
i courtissued :31 11013125 directing appellant to pay the required filing fee within ten days. The natice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. T0 (late,
appellant; has nut paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court’s
11013108. Accordmgly, cause appearmg, thlS appeal, IS dismissed.
l I? It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACIE K. LINDEMAN
BY: K My’flb
cc: Hun. Sandra L. Pomrenze, District Judge: Family Court Division J ustin Petrilla Willie}: Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME CuURT OF NEVADA
CLERK’S ORDER
mm , l r” 6
Ct
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Petrilla v. Castillo (Child Custody) (Petrilla v. Castillo (Child Custody)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.