Petrilla v. Castillo (Child Custody)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 20, 2015·No. 67566·Unpublished

Opinion

An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 12 .

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JUSTIN PETRILLA, No. 87566

. l‘a‘ Ff: :: MARISSA. ROSE CASTILLQ, F g is Eu- Q Reecndent. ‘

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This pro se appeal was docketed in this court on March 13, 2015, without payment of the requisite filing-fee. On that same day, this

i courtissued :31 11013125 directing appellant to pay the required filing fee within ten days. The natice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. T0 (late,

appellant; has nut paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court’s

11013108. Accordmgly, cause appearmg, thlS appeal, IS dismissed.

l I? It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACIE K. LINDEMAN

BY: K My’flb

cc: Hun. Sandra L. Pomrenze, District Judge: Family Court Division J ustin Petrilla Willie}: Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME CuURT OF NEVADA

CLERK’S ORDER

mm , l r” 6

Ct

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petrilla v. Castillo (Child Custody), (Neb. 2015).

Petrilla v. Castillo (Child Custody) (Petrilla v. Castillo (Child Custody)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.