Petrik v. City of Pembroke Pines

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Petrik v. City of Pembroke Pines

120 So. 3d 102, 2013 WL 4007057, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12345

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 7, 2013

DocketNo. 4D12-2676

StatusPublished

This text of 120 So. 3d 102 (Petrik v. City of Pembroke Pines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petrik v. City of Pembroke Pines, 120 So. 3d 102, 2013 WL 4007057, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12345 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See City of Hollywood v. Hogan, 986 So.2d 634, 641-42 (Fla. 4th DCA [103]*1032008) (adopting federal ADEA analysis for age discrimination claim under Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992; stating “[a]ge discrimination statutes protect only employment decisions which disadvantage an older worker in favor of a younger worker”) (citing Gen. Dynamics Land Sys., Inc. v. Cline, 540 U.S. 581, 124 S.Ct. 1236, 157 L.Ed.2d 1094 (2004)); see also Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Eghbal, 54 So.3d 525, 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (adopting federal analysis for state age discrimination claim, including the requirement that, to state a prima facie case, plaintiff must prove “the position was filled by a worker who was substantially younger than the plaintiff’), review denied, Miami-Dade County v. Eghbal, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., STEVENSON and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See City of Hollywood v. Hogan, 986 So.2d 634, 641-42 (Fla. 4th DCA [103]*1032008) (adopting federal ADEA analysis for age discrimination claim under Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992; stating “[a]ge discrimination statutes protect only employment decisions which disadvantage an older worker in favor of a younger worker”) (citing Gen. Dynamics Land Sys., Inc. v. Cline, 540 U.S. 581, 124 S.Ct. 1236, 157 L.Ed.2d 1094 (2004)); see also Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Eghbal, 54 So.3d 525, 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (adopting federal analysis for state age discrimination claim, including the requirement that, to state a prima facie case, plaintiff must prove “the position was filled by a worker who was substantially younger than the plaintiff’), review denied, Miami-Dade County v. Eghbal, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., STEVENSON and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 So. 3d 102, 2013 WL 4007057, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrik-v-city-of-pembroke-pines-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack