Petri Positive Pest Control, Inc. v. CCM Condominium Association, Inc. d/b/a Country Club Manor Condominium Association

174 So. 3d 1122, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14074, 2015 WL 5613369

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: September 24, 2015
• Docket: 4D14-4728
• Status: Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Petri Positive Pest Control, Inc. (Petri), seeks certiorari relief from a November 12, 2014 order granting respondent CCM Condominium Association, Inc.’s (CCM) motion for leave to assert a punitive damages claim. See § 768.72, Fla. Stat. (2014). Certiorari review is available to determine whether a trial court has complied with the procedural requirements of section 768.72, but not the sufficiency of the evidence. See Globe Newspaper Co. v. King, 658 So.2d 518, 520 (Fla.1995).

Although the trial court held a hearing on the matter, neither the court’s verbal comments nor written order indicate whether it found that CCM demonstrated a reasonable basis for seeking punitive damages. “(W]e read section 768.72 as creating a positive legal right in a party not to be subjected to financial worth discovery until the trial court has first made an affirmative finding that there is a reasonable evidentiary basis for the punitive damages claim to go to the jury.” Henn v. Sandler, 589 So.2d 1334, 1335 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (emphasis added). We quash the order on review and remand for the trial court to enter its affirmative findings or, if necessary, hold further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

STEVENSON, GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.