Petrelli Associates, Inc. v. Germano

277 A.D.2d 439, 717 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12268
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 27, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property and to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants August T. Segreto and Denise Segreto appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Klein, J.), dated March 9, 2000, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to dismiss their second counterclaim alleging abuse of process.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the appellants’ second counterclaim alleging abuse of process failed to state the essential elements for such a claim (see, Curiano v Suozzi, 63 NY2d 113; EECP Ctrs. v Vasomedical, Inc., 265 AD2d 372). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petrelli Associates, Inc. v. Germano, 277 A.D.2d 439, 717 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

277 A.D.2d 439 (Petrelli Associates, Inc. v. Germano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Segreto v. Petrelli Associates, Inc.
285 A.D.2d 499 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)