Petrecca v. J. Carotenuto & Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Petrecca v. J. Carotenuto & Sons, Inc.

23 A.D.2d 656, 257 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4570

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 656 (Petrecca v. J. Carotenuto & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petrecca v. J. Carotenuto & Sons, Inc., 23 A.D.2d 656, 257 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on January 19, 1965, denying a motion by plaintiff in Action No. 1 to consolidate Actions No. 1 and No. 2 and to remove Action No. 2 from the Surrogate’s Court to the Supreme Court, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to respondents. The court, in affirming, does so in the exercise of discretion and does not find it necessary to reach the question of power. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on January 19, 1965, denying a motion by plaintiff in Action No. 1 to consolidate Actions No. 1 and No. 2 and to remove Action No. 2 from the Surrogate’s Court to the Supreme Court, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to respondents. The court, in affirming, does so in the exercise of discretion and does not find it necessary to reach the question of power. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 656, 257 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrecca-v-j-carotenuto-sons-inc-nyappdiv-1965.