Petrandis v. Three Crowns & A. Stern, Inc.

680 So. 2d 1089, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10499, 1996 WL 577347
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 1996·No. No. 96-317·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cantor v. Cochran, 184 So.2d 173 (Fla.1966); Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Kendall, 88 So.2d 276 (Fla. 1956), explained, Keith v. News & Sun Sentinel Co., 667 So.2d 167 (Fla.1995). See also T & T Communications, Inc. v. State of Florida, Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 460 So.2d 996 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); United States Tel. Co. v. State of Florida, Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 410 So.2d .1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). See generally Kane Furniture Corp. v. Miranda, 506 So.2d 1061, 1064 (Fla. 2d DCA) (“If a person is subject to the control or direction of another as to his results only, he is an independent contractor; if he is subject to control as to the means used to achieve the results, he is an employee.”), review denied, 515 So.2d 230 (Fla.1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petrandis v. Three Crowns & A. Stern, Inc., 680 So. 2d 1089, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10499, 1996 WL 577347 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

680 So. 2d 1089 (Petrandis v. Three Crowns & A. Stern, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keith v. News & Sun Sentinel Co.
667 So. 2d 167 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Kane Furniture Corp. v. Miranda
506 So. 2d 1061 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Cantor v. Cochran
184 So. 2d 173 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Miami Herald Publishing Company v. Kendall
88 So. 2d 276 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
T & T Comm. v. State Dept. of Labor
460 So. 2d 996 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)