Petrandis v. Three Crowns & A. Stern, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Petrandis v. Three Crowns & A. Stern, Inc.

680 So. 2d 1089, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10499, 1996 WL 577347

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 9, 1996

DocketNo. 96-317

StatusPublished

This text of 680 So. 2d 1089 (Petrandis v. Three Crowns & A. Stern, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petrandis v. Three Crowns & A. Stern, Inc., 680 So. 2d 1089, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10499, 1996 WL 577347 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cantor v. Cochran, 184 So.2d 173 (Fla.1966); Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Kendall, 88 So.2d 276 (Fla. 1956), explained, Keith v. News & Sun Sentinel Co., 667 So.2d 167 (Fla.1995). See also T & T Communications, Inc. v. State of Florida, Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 460 So.2d 996 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); United States Tel. Co. v. State of Florida, Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 410 So.2d .1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). See generally Kane Furniture Corp. v. Miranda, 506 So.2d 1061, 1064 (Fla. 2d DCA) (“If a person is subject to the control or direction of another as to his results only, he is an independent contractor; if he is subject to control as to the means used to achieve the results, he is an employee.”), review denied, 515 So.2d 230 (Fla.1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cantor v. Cochran, 184 So.2d 173 (Fla.1966); Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Kendall, 88 So.2d 276 (Fla. 1956), explained, Keith v. News & Sun Sentinel Co., 667 So.2d 167 (Fla.1995). See also T & T Communications, Inc. v. State of Florida, Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 460 So.2d 996 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); United States Tel. Co. v. State of Florida, Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 410 So.2d .1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). See generally Kane Furniture Corp. v. Miranda, 506 So.2d 1061, 1064 (Fla. 2d DCA) (“If a person is subject to the control or direction of another as to his results only, he is an independent contractor; if he is subject to control as to the means used to achieve the results, he is an employee.”), review denied, 515 So.2d 230 (Fla.1987).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

680 So. 2d 1089, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10499, 1996 WL 577347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrandis-v-three-crowns-a-stern-inc-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack