Petrakopoulos v. Vranas

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Petrakopoulos v. Vranas

768 S.E.2d 284, 330 Ga. App. 532, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 6

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 2015

DocketA13A1055

StatusPublished

This text of 768 S.E.2d 284 (Petrakopoulos v. Vranas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petrakopoulos v. Vranas, 768 S.E.2d 284, 330 Ga. App. 532, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 6 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

MCMILLIAN, Judge.

In Petrakopoulos v. Vranas, 325 Ga. App. 332 (750 SE2d 779) (2013), we reversed the trial court’s order appointing a special master and granting preliminary and injunctive relief, and we affirmed in part and reversed in part the trial court’s order denying the motion for summary judgment filed by George A. Petrakopoulos, Sam Mellas, and Alpha Soda Company (“Alpha Soda”). In Petrakopoulos v. Vra-nas, 296 Ga. 48 (764 SE2d 858) (2014), the Supreme Court of Georgia vacated the portion of our opinion addressing Gus Vranas’s purported claim for unjust enrichment because Vranas contended, for the first time, in the appeal before the Supreme Court that “he never raised an unjust enrichment claim against Alpha Soda and that no such claim exists,” id., although he never informed this Court that he did not [533]*533intend to raise such a claim. Id. at n.l. We therefore vacate Division 3 (c) of our earlier opinion and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own.

Decided January 15, 2015. Eric T. Johnson, James C. Watkins, Shingler Lewis, George P. Shingler, for appellants. Kennon Peebles, Jr., Leon Van Gelderen, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed in part and vacated in part.

Andrews, P. J., and Dillard, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MCMILLIAN, Judge.

In Petrakopoulos v. Vranas, 325 Ga. App. 332 (750 SE2d 779) (2013), we reversed the trial court’s order appointing a special master and granting preliminary and injunctive relief, and we affirmed in part and reversed in part the trial court’s order denying the motion for summary judgment filed by George A. Petrakopoulos, Sam Mellas, and Alpha Soda Company (“Alpha Soda”). In Petrakopoulos v. Vra-nas, 296 Ga. 48 (764 SE2d 858) (2014), the Supreme Court of Georgia vacated the portion of our opinion addressing Gus Vranas’s purported claim for unjust enrichment because Vranas contended, for the first time, in the appeal before the Supreme Court that “he never raised an unjust enrichment claim against Alpha Soda and that no such claim exists,” id., although he never informed this Court that he did not [533]*533intend to raise such a claim. Id. at n.l. We therefore vacate Division 3 (c) of our earlier opinion and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own.

Decided January 15, 2015. Eric T. Johnson, James C. Watkins, Shingler Lewis, George P. Shingler, for appellants. Kennon Peebles, Jr., Leon Van Gelderen, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed in part and vacated in part.

Andrews, P. J., and Dillard, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

768 S.E.2d 284, 330 Ga. App. 532, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrakopoulos-v-vranas-gactapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack