Petitti Vs. Wu
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARIE PETITTI; AND PAUL U. No. 82784 PAWLIK, INDIVIDUALS,
Appellants,
vs.
RULIAN WU, ALSO REFERRED TO AS, FILE
WU RULIAN; AND CITY OF LAS SEP 0 7 2021 VEGAS, CLARK COUNTY, A. BROWN PREME COURT
Respondents.
DE rt CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).
It is so ORDERED.'
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BRO:A,
Z
..L.
BY:
cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Walsh & Rosevear Las Vegas City Attorney Brennan Legal Counsel Group, PLLC Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT iThe court will take no action in regard to the motion filed on August OF NEVADA 31, 2021.
CLERK'S ORDER
0) 047 7.5101
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Petitti Vs. Wu (Petitti Vs. Wu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.