Petitti v. Sheriff, Clark County
This text of 530 P.2d 758 (Petitti v. Sheriff, Clark County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[15]*15OPINION
Gary Petitti was ordered to stand trial for sale of a controlled substance (diacetylmorphine, commonly known as heroin) to a person under 21 years of age, a felony under NRS 453.321 and NRS 453.161.
In a pretrial habeas challenge he contended there was insufficient evidence adduced at the preliminary examination to establish probable cause that he committed the charged offense, as required by NRS 171.206. The district court denied habeas and Petitti argues the order of the district court' should be reversed. We agree.
Although the information charged that Petitti made a sale to a person under 21 years of age, the record of the preliminary examination is barren of any document or testimony that even alludes to the age of the person to whom the sale was purportedly made.1
In cases where age is an issue, competent proof thereof is essential.2 Cf. Gay v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 118, 508 P.2d 1 (1973).
Accordingly, the district court should have granted the habeas petition. The district court’s order denying habeas corpus therefore is reversed, and the court is instructed to grant such writ without prejudice to institution of such charges as the state may determine it can produce evidence to prove.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
530 P.2d 758, 91 Nev. 14, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petitti-v-sheriff-clark-county-nev-1975.