Petito v. Washington Post Co.
This text of 466 F. App'x 191 (Petito v. Washington Post Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Christopher Petito, Stephen Sieber, and Ronald Williams appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the informal briefs filed by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Petito v. The Washington Post Companies, No. 8:11-cv-01314-RWT (D.Md., July 8, 2011). We deny the motion to recuse the lower court judges and deny the motion to consolidate this appeal with Appeal No. 11-2208. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 F. App'x 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petito-v-washington-post-co-ca4-2012.