Petito v. Goodman

209 A.D.2d 678, 619 N.Y.S.2d 948

This text of 209 A.D.2d 678 (Petito v. Goodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petito v. Goodman, 209 A.D.2d 678, 619 N.Y.S.2d 948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the nonparty appellant Edwin Weidman appeals from an [679]*679order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated July 27, 1994, which denied his application to be relieved as trial counsel for the plaintiff.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Upon the record before us, we cannot conclude that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant’s application to be relieved (see, Rann v Lerner, 160 AD2d 922). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rann v. Lerner
160 A.D.2d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D.2d 678, 619 N.Y.S.2d 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petito-v-goodman-nyappdiv-1994.