Petito v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Petito v. Goodman

209 A.D.2d 678, 619 N.Y.S.2d 948

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 28, 1994·Published

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the nonparty appellant Edwin Weidman appeals from an [679] order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated July 27, 1994, which denied his application to be relieved as trial counsel for the plaintiff.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Upon the record before us, we cannot conclude that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant’s application to be relieved (see, Rann v Lerner, 160 AD2d 922). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the nonparty appellant Edwin Weidman appeals from an [679] order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated July 27, 1994, which denied his application to be relieved as trial counsel for the plaintiff.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Upon the record before us, we cannot conclude that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant’s application to be relieved (see, Rann v Lerner, 160 AD2d 922). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Petito v. Goodman, 209 A.D.2d 678, 619 N.Y.S.2d 948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

209 A.D.2d 678 (Petito v. Goodman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related