Petitjean v. Arceneaux

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Petitjean v. Arceneaux

266 So. 2d 565, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6762

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 19, 1972

DocketNo. 4058

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 So. 2d 565 (Petitjean v. Arceneaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petitjean v. Arceneaux, 266 So. 2d 565, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6762 (La. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

CULPEPPER, Judge.

ON MOTION TO REMAND

Plaintiff appellee filed a motion to remand this case to enable him to traverse the affidavits of poverty filed by defendants-appellants in support of their motion to prosecute this appeal in forma pauperis. Our jurisprudence is now established that plaintiff appellee is entitled to the remand which he seeks. See Affiliated Foods, Inc. v. Blanchard, 256 So.2d 363 (3rd Cir. 1971) and the authorities cited therein.

[566]*566For the reasons assigned, this case is remanded to the district court for the purpose of allowing plaintiff-appellee to traverse the affidavits of poverty on the basis of which appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI